Blue Note Records
Photo
by Sophie Leroux
Photo by Michael Wong
Courtesy of Greg Osby
Courtesy of Mark Shim
|
A
FIRESIDE CHAT WITH THE BLUE NOTE NEW DIRECTIONS BAND
FEATURING STEFON HARRIS, JASON MORAN, GREG OSBY AND MARK SHIM
Stefon Harris, Jason Moran, Greg Osby, and Mark Shim (in alphabetic order)
are blue chippers, well, with the exception of Osby because he's just
old. They are the foursome that make up the frontline for Blue Note's
bright future. Our candid conversation with the New Directions Band is
about as good as it gets. Osby can smell the bullshit from a mile away,
but if you are honest with him, he gives that respect right back to you,
and frankly, that is why I dig the guy. He is all about the music and
so are Stefon, Jason, and Mark. I present to you, Stefon Harris, Jason
Moran, Greg Osby, and Mark Shim (in alphabetic order), unedited and in
their own words.
FRED JUNG: Let's start from the beginning. (All members)
STEFON HARRIS: Well, I'm originally from upstate New York, from Albany.
I wasn't exposed to straight-ahead jazz there, but I was exposed to a
lot of classical music. So I actually started out focusing primarily on
classical music and then when I got to college, that's when I first heard
Charlie Parker and Dexter Gordon and people like that and just sort of
stumbled onto it. I came across the vibraphone because I was a classical
percussionist and as a classical percussionist, that's just one of the
instruments that you have to learn how to play. So when I first heard
jazz, I had to decide am I going to play vibes or drums or piano or whatever
and I heard Milt Jackson that first year also, so he was a big inspiration
for me.
JASON
MORAN: I began when I was seven years old. I started playing classical
piano as like a disciplinary issue with my parents. Myself and my two
brothers were put into music lessons. My older brother played violin and
my younger brother and I played piano. We did that for about seven years
and when my older brother quit, we decided to quit also because we didn't
see any joy in it. There was no joy in practicing over and over and over
again, trying to get something perfect when we didn't even like it, so
we ended up quitting all together and I was very happy. So I quit piano
about a year. Then I came back to the piano when I heard like a Thelonious
Monk record. That was like my rebirth. Ever since then, I went to a performing
and visual arts high school in Houston and that's where I learned a lot
of my harmony theory and the basics of improvisation and that's when I
started to study the masters of the piano and of jazz in general or improvised
music. I studied people like McCoy Tyner, Thelonious Monk, Herbie Hancock,
Bill Evans, you know, those type of players. Right when I was graduating
from high school, I was coming to New York to study with Jaki Byard, so
I knew that I would have to study some other type of piano players because
I knew he was a true historian. So that's when I went back and started
studying Art Tatum, Erroll Garner, Earl Hines, James P. Johnson, Teddy
Wilson, those type of piano players with a stronger left hand is what
I call it, people like Duke Ellington. When I got to New York and started
studying with Jaki, he imparted his knowledge and from then on, I was
I think destined to go into a different direction rather than the normal
direction. What I call normal is where somebody is repeating vocabulary
from thirty or forty years ago without trying to create their own. I was
influenced by him a lot and all the knowledge from four years that I was
under his wing. After I finished, well, he passed away recently, right
before he passed, I guess maybe a year and a half before, I had started
to have an affiliation with Greg Osby and from then on, Greg kind of gave
me that extra push that I needed to spur the music in a further leftist
direction. From then on, I guess, you can look at everything else, the
records, and you can chart the progress I hope, Fred.
GREG OSBY: I started playing in 1972. My first instrument was clarinet.
I'm from St. Louis for those that don't know. I graduated to alto saxophone,
I guess a year later. I started to play in local R&B groups, funk bands,
and blues bands throughout high school, I guess between 1974 and 1978.
I got a scholarship to Howard University in 1978, transferred to Berklee
College of Music in 1980 and moved to New York in 1983. Then I started
to work with a host of jazz elders and notables, namely Dizzy Gillespie,
Woody Shaw, Lester Bowie, Herbie Hancock, Muhal Richard Abrams, Jon Faddis,
Jack DeJohnette, Joanne Brackeen, the list is pretty extensive. That's
it in a nutshell. There's a lot more detail.
MARK
SHIM: I guess starting back in high school, my mom told me that I needed
an extracurricular activity to do, just as a change of pace from the other
things I did like playing sports with my friends or whatever. She told
me that I should just try to be in the band and so I decided, "OK, why
not?" It will just give me something else to do and I ended up playing
saxophone once I started out in the middle school band. I didn't choose
to play that instrument. That kind of was chosen for me, but the more
and more I started playing with the band, I got more interested in it.
I started getting better at it. I continued through high school. I first
started listening to jazz when I was in tenth grade in high school and
I decided to take private lessons then, I think when I was in eleventh
grade from the saxophone teacher who was teaching at Virginia Commonwealth
University. That's when I started getting really interested in jazz. Throughout
middle school and in high school was when I started getting into the music.
It just got more serious once I got into my later years toward high school
in terms of listening to jazz. I just carried that on through to college.
I eventually moved to New York and here I am now.
FJ: Influences? (All members)
STEFON HARRIS: There are a lot of people. I think because I came to the
music a little later than a lot of other people, I ended up just being
a scatterbrain and just taking a little bit of information from everybody.
Of course, Milt Jackson was one of the first people that I really dug
off on the vibes, as far as playing straight-ahead jazz, then Bobby Hutcherson
and Lionel Hampton. Those are my three main influences at the vibraphone.
I learned a lot from checking out Red Garland and some Charlie Parker,
John Coltrane, and conceptually, listening to those great ensembles of
Miles Davis. Those were some of the influences, compositionally, Wayne
Shorter.
JASON MORAN: Well, there are people that I admire as far as how they lived
their life like Jaki, how he lived his life. He lived to be about seventy-six,
seventy-seven. There's something about an older cat like him and Andrew
Hill and Muhal Richard Abrams. They have like a different spirit even
in their old age, they're like steadily searching or trying to create
new ideas or they're more interested in what I am trying to figure out
in music than what I'm asking them about. I go over their house or I speak
to them on the phone and they are just as interested in what I'm doing
as in what I'm asking them about like, "Oh, how are you approaching blah
blah blah?" And I ask Andrew about how does he approach solo concerts
and he says, "Well, I look at the audience and I determine what I play
by how they feel or how I think they feel." So that's a different direction
just to think in rather than, "Well, I'm going to play this because this
is an up tempo song that I'm going to format my set according to styles
or pieces." He'd rather react from the crowd, his vibe towards them. It's
people like that, that I consider are true artists in how they live their
life like my uncle was an artist, a visual artist, so I just watched how
he lives. He lives out in Louisiana. He lived out in the country. He's
lived there for I guess the past twenty, thirty years maybe, I don't know.
He built his own house. He's right next to the river and he built his
own studio that he could paint in. I mean just like really self-sufficient
cats. He has a family and then everybody like loves his art. He's like
a photographer. It's just that drive that I really latched onto. That's
a really good life trait to have, is to have that drive to where you don't
ever get satisfied by anything or you don't get satisfied by success or
a review or whatever else. You get satisfied from making your art and
that's about it. Those are some of the life traits that I've picked up
on from the people that I have met over the years.
GREG OSBY: Actually I draw from more eclectic types, people that have
a real personalized view, off kilter if you will to the average person,
but actually I think they are brilliant, people like Andrew Hill, Duke
Ellington, Thelonious Monk, Art Tatum, Miles Davis, people that have a
really broad and reaching and expansive perspective on a solid group concept
and personalized compositional message and aren't afraid to harness whatever
is necessary to get to the next level, to develop the next sound. Always
looking forward, not living for the moment or in the moment, but are always
in transition and developing. People that are perpetual students of live
and the arts, those are the people that appeal to me.
MARK SHIM: I guess for music, it's been several, several people. I can't
even narrow it down to probably three or four. It's been a lot more than
that. I guess you can say I have gone through phases too, where I like
somebody for like a phase, whether it's like for a month, six months,
or a couple of years. The ones who were a couple of years long were not
too good for me, not that they were, of course they were great musicians,
but that is not good, I think, for anybody to be that attached to somebody
for that long. Fortunately, I was able to get out of those phases. There
are several people. I think the first main person was Charlie Parker,
because that's the first person who I started transcribing their solos.
It moved on to other people like Sonny Rollins and John Coltrane and I
eventually started getting back into people like Eddie "Lockjaw" Davis,
Joe Henderson, several different people. And there is all sorts of other
people who I listen to that maybe not a lot of people are familiar with,
but I really checked out because they had something distinct to my ears
like Jimmy Forrest, who when I first heard him, I was really amazed at
his sound and his flexibility on the saxophone. There's definitely a lot
of people along the way who definitely had some sort of influence in terms
of what I wanted to do. I don't know how many saxophone players have even
heard of him. He's an amazing player to me.
FJ: Let's touch on your latest projects. (All members)
STEFON HARRIS: On Black Action Figure, the rhythm section is Eric Harland
on drums, Tarus Mateen at the bass, and Jason Moran on piano. I had some
horns on there. Gary Thomas played tenor and alto flute, and then Steve
Turre, trombone, and Greg Osby. It was a really great lineup of musicians.
It was a group of musicians who had been playing together for quite some
time. Everyone had a connection to one another. Jason and Eric Harland went
to high school together. We all went to college together, myself, Jason,
and Eric. I've been Tarus for about five years now. We worked together with
Tim Warfield and then Greg, we all were working together also. Jason was
in Greg's group. Eric Harland was with Greg for a while. I played with Greg.
It was just like a nice community that was natural. It was not like I've
thrown together group of people, "OK, we've got to do a record, let's get
some musicians who can play the parts." There was a real chemistry that
we let cultivate over a couple of years. I just played the Vanguard with
Jacky Terrasson and it was amazing, one of the best experiences I've had
playing music. Jacky and I had a very natural chemistry. Sometimes it takes
a lot of time and sometimes it is there. When you first play a couple of
notes with one another, you're just on the same page. We're looking forward
to working with one another in the future. There was a lot of interaction,
which leaves room for spontaneity and when the music is spontaneous, it's
alive. We're discovering it as we are on the stage playing. We don't know
what's going to happen next. That also creates a more communal feeling to
the music. It includes the audience because we're discovering it as they're
discovering it. We're sharing this whole process. It's much bigger than
we are.
JASON MORAN: The Soundtrack to Human Motion was my first venture as a quote,
unquote leader. Sometimes, I don't consider myself, or you think about yourself
in that manner because being in a band like Greg's for the past like three
or four years, three years I guess it's been. I don't think of it like I'm
the leader of this band or I'm the sideman and I don't have any say because
Greg was a lot freer than other quote, unquote leaders are. Some leaders
strictly want to play their music and some leaders will like to play other
people's music, which I think is like really hip. Being in Greg's band for
the past three years, we've even incorporated like basically the same music
of, some of my music and some of his music. The last gig we did, he was
even letting me play a trio song per set and he started to let that happen.
I rarely see it when I go hear music. The only person I can think of was
maybe a longtime ago and Bobby Hutcherson would do a record and it would
be like all Andrew Hill compositions. Muhal Richard Abrams, he just had
like a big band concert and they didn't perform any of his pieces. It was
a Muhal Richard Abrams Experimental Ensemble and they didn't play any of
his pieces. He didn't take any solos either and he was on the stage. There
was something about that that struck me. There was no ego there. There was
really a lot of love for everyone's writing and everyone's contribution
to the concert. He didn't feel that he had to put his name on anything or
take like this spotlight over everything. So that type of approach led me
to hire the band that I had, which is basically people that have been affiliated
with Greg over the past years while I was in his band. Stefon Harris, who
was my roommate, Greg, Lonnie Plaxico, and Eric Harland. Eric and I have
had an affiliation for the past six or seven years since high school, Stefon,
since the past six years in college. Lonnie, I met a while ago. So there
was already a camaraderie there. It really came across, I think on the record
as a very good outing and it was a very comfortable feeling making that
record because I didn't have any mistakes or any barriers to overcome. It
was a very easy setting in the studio and everybody was really well rehearsed
on the music so we could just go in and knock it out with no problem. The
concept of the record overall is what I call human motion, which is a person's
daily movements throughout the day. I have like certain movements that I
make when I'm playing the piano and the other musicians do also. That was
also my affiliation with the love of soundtracks of movies, the cinema.
You could call it like a, not a day in the life of me, but a day in the
life of you, whereas each song may serve as a soundtrack for a certain point
in your day. We're going into the studio in January to do a trio record,
which will consist of Tarus Mateen playing bass and Eric Harland playing
drums. Something that I'm thinking about, you never know what will happen
when you get in there, is like a keyboard family type of thing, mostly piano
stuff but also play Rhodes and also play B-3 organ. Because I had been on
tour with this trombonist and Billy Hart was playing drums, so I was playing
organ for about a week and a half and we were in Europe and I was really
starting to grasp hold of some of the elements of the organ. There's a lot
of power behind the instrument and you can alter the sounds like very easily
and really get into some different zones that you can't even achieve with
the piano and vice versa. So I was like, "Man, I'd like to do some organ
stuff." Because I don't even think the people who are playing organ now,
or the younger folks, well they're aren't any at all, but it's been abandoned.
It's like an abandoned instrument. It's definitely a beast to master and
I've come nowhere close to it. I'd really like to record some of my music
on it, just to see what it would sound like. It was very interesting just
to play on it because I have no formal training on it. I'm going into it
blind and you have no rules to abide by, basically going off on what you
think sounds good.
GREG OSBY: Well, Zero was kind of a high concept piece and was reflective
of what I was thinking about at the time and how I tried to corral that
way of thinking into my group concept, my working band at the time. There
was a lot of Japanese focusing techniques and concentration and a lot of
high math actually too. It was received with a luck warm anticipation as
was anticipated, a kind of tongue and cheek thing. When I called it Zero,
I was referring to the numerical influence but also to the copy so that
was kind of an inside joke (laughing) because people just aren't hearing
it. They aren't really hearing the music unless it reminds them of something
that's really solid or something that's highly influential or steadfast
and codified and newer types of expression, you know, original music, conceptual
works and arts, they'd probably give you some kind of posthumous award,
but I look at it like I'm in good company because a lot of my heroes, they
weren't really heralded in their day and they worked really hard. It's just
the same thing so I just honor their example and continue to do what I want
to do. And Zero is reflective of months and months of study and research
and self-imposed sabbatical and that's what I came up with. Banned In New
York was kind of a fluke in that the initial intention wasn't for it to
be released or any kind of recording for anybody else's conception. It was
done with a mini-disc. My new drummer at the time, Rodney Green, who was
eighteen years old at the time, he was new in the band and he was recording
his progress each night with a digital mini-disc recorder. He asked me to
listen to it, which I was reluctant to do because I don't really like to
listen to works by the group when it's in performance because you tend to
nitpick and start to pick at it and start to tell cats what to do and give
too much directives. Don't do this and do this more, instead of letting
it flow and develop on its own. I reluctantly listened and I was pleasantly
surprised. I took a copy of it and presented it to the President of Blue
Note, Bruce Lundvall and we shot around this idea back and forth about releasing
this bootleg type of product. It was reflective of that. It sounded really
raw and unrefined. It wasn't the more sterling portrayal of the band as
it would be in a controlled environment like in a studio, but it did capture
the essence of the moment, the ferocity of a live performance, non-stop,
pretty much seamless. It also reminded me of a lot of old Charlie Parker
air shots from Birdland or something like that. That's why the packaging
is just like that. I wanted it to look like it was an unapproved bootleg,
so that's why it looks all faded out and really raw like that. It worked
really well and that actually was more well received than some of the more
legitimate releases because of the way it looked, people were drawn in to
the unorthodox presentation of the cover and then the music was almost like
being there. A proximity recording based upon where you might be sitting,
that's what the band would have sounded like if you were in attendance.
So that's why I'm really proud of that. I have a new project. The title
is called The Invisible Hand and The Invisible Hand is my code word for
the direction given by the invisible hand of the elders, the ancestors in
the music that, I guess, guide us in the right directions to make the proper
decisions. We're guided by these forces, these specters, this invisible
hand. We hope that like I said, honor their example and do the right thing,
as opposed to bastardizing the music or trivializing it. It also kind of
an honor note to the two people that mean so much to me that I was able
to acquire their services for, for this project and that is Andrew Hill
and Jim Hall, whom I have traveled and toured extensively with and recorded
with them both. They have had a tremendous impact on my development as a
contemporary composer and thinker. The fact that they represent two completely
opposite ends of the musical spectrum is even an added bonus. Jim is the
master of subtlety, dimension, and color and Andrew is the quirky, kind
of a Nutty Professor, absent-minded genius, compositional icon for me. To
have them on the same project and to get them to play together when they're
so different. They hadn't even met before the rehearsals for the project
and probably never would have played together. I was able to bring them
together, they're like two opposite polarities. It was a challenge for myself
to navigate within that polarity. You have this kind of positive, negative
energy. It was just a great thing and I'm really, really proud of what we
came up with and I'm sure that everyone will be astounded by the results.
I think that hopefully it will establish a precedent and maybe other people
will follow suit because there is a tremendous generation gap between my
peers and the elders and even some of the younger people. We just need to
straddle the fence more and play with each other and exchange information
otherwise, the music is going to crawl along. We're being eclipsed by so
much music. It's not even real music. They get more attention. They get
more consideration. You have music being produced by people who aren't even
musicians that have no kind of musical aptitude what so ever. You have great
artists and great masters of American music that aren't getting any kind
of accolades, any kind of attention at all. Hopefully, this will encourage
people to put on their thinking caps and play with each other. In the fall,
I'm releasing another project that was actually recorded before The Invisible
Hand, but we flip-flopped the releases because The Invisible Hand makes
such a great story because I have Terri Lyne Carrington on drums, Scott
Colley on bass, and my buddy, Gary Thomas on tenor saxophone, so my code
name was Misfits 2000, because I got all these people together that probably
never will play together under normal circumstances, so that's really great.
This next project is called The Inner Circle. It's comprised of myself,
my right hand man, Jason Moran on piano, vibraphonist Stefon Harris, Tarus
Mateen on bass, and Nasheet Waits on drums. It represents this little group
of people that I've been working with and kind of giving council to. They
kind of proclaimed me some type of mentor too. I'm happy to be a part of
it and to give my two cents and be instructive when called upon to do so.
I'm just sitting back, witnessing the results of the work and enjoying the
results of this youthful energy and aptitude and zeal. These cats are incredible
artists, musicians, and thinkers. It's really amazing that they're so young.
They haven't had the type of experiences that I had. They came right out
of college and got record deals and stuff. They weren't able to play with
a host of elders and go on the road and really get that seasoning, but they
show a different type of maturity that is not necessarily the dirt under
the finger nails on the road type of on your knees type of thing. It's a
different type of intellectual prowess that they display and I'm really
happy that they stand as representative of things to come.
MARK SHIM: Mind Over Matter. That album, I wasn't really that much fond
of it as time goes by. Most people when they do their first record, they
outgrow it, some quicker than others. I definitely feel like I've outgrown
that record, not trying to be egotistical or anything, but that was a period
of time in my life where I think I was very, very confused as to what direction
I wanted to go in musically. I guess there was some good moments that came
out of that record, but I was definitely confused and trying a lot of things
with my sound. Even though people tell me I have a recognizable sound and
everything and to a certain degree I feel like I do, but doesn't necessarily
mean that that is the exact sound that I want to have. I'm still working
on my sound and trying new things to get closer to what I hear in my head,
but compositionally definitely I know that I was confused. There are some
things that I wrote that were nice, but it was definitely not like something
I can put my own signature and say, "This is the way that I'm writing and
you know if you hear this, this is going to be my tune." That is definitely
what I and most people would like to get to involved in music is having
their own sound within their horn and within the music that they write.
They're composers. To me, I didn't come anywhere close to that on the first
record, but it's a debut. At least, I try not to be too hard on myself.
It was a good first experience playing with those guys though because I
definitely had some very top quality musicians on that record, for example,
Geri Allen and Curtis Lundy. The level of talent on that record is very
high. That's what really helped that record out is the quality of musicians
on that record. I have a project called Turbulent Flow coming up. I definitely
think that I am a lot more focused and have a lot more direction on this
record. A few of my musical colleagues who have heard the record have definitely
noticed a difference in terms of the direction that I have moved in. I definitely
have more of a concept. As far as the musicians I used, Edward Simon on
piano. Drew Gress on bass, Eric Harland on drums, and Stefon Harris on vibraphones
on I think three of the tunes. It was mostly all original compositions except
one or two. I was definitely a lot happier, a lot more pleased with the
way it came out. I'm sure a year from now, even though it's almost a year
since I recorded, the good thing is that I am still a little happy with
it. It hasn't worn down on me yet at this point. I'm sure probably a year
from now, I will look back on it and I'll be like, "There's a lot more things
that I could have done a lot better." I'm just happy with the progress that
was made from the first record to the second record. There definitely a
noticeable difference in the musical quality of it and the maturity and
sound of the record. It may be hard for some people to grasp it. It's not
anything that is outrageous or completely different or anything, but it's
something that's different than what most people would probably except to
hear from me.
FJ: You just concluded an extensive tour with Renegade Way, any plans to
record that band (Gary Thomas, Ravi Coltrane, Steve Coleman)? (Greg Osby
only)
GREG OSBY: I don't know if it's going to be record just as yet because even
though we were out almost seven weeks, there were still a lot of holes in
the concept. We were formulating things and working it out as it came along.
It is still not ready for that kind of documentation. There are still a
lot of things to do. We were doing something that was without precedent
and given that and being our own critics, we don't want to put it out there
until it's really worthy of it. The tour was great. We were trekking back
and forth to near and far points throughout Europe. It was quite grueling
actually, the routing and the pacing and the scheduling, but it worked out
wonderfully on a musical tip, but it's still not ready. I've become ever
more critical these days, especially in light of a lot of the haphazard
product that is released. People slap together these things without a moment's
thought. Cats putting the money into their pockets and not putting the money
into the work. It's just these blowing session date type things where there's
no concept. It's just like let's do some tunes, slap some old tunes, do
some Jerome Kerns tunes, Rodgers & Hart tunes, or Gershwin tunes, or whatever
these tunes that aren't really reflective of any kind of contemporary notion
at all. It's almost like these backdated, retrospective projects and they
don't sound good, they sound rushed. I'm not really down for that. I don't
want to put out anything unless it's been given a lot of thought. It's been
in the lab and we've done trials and retrials and done a lot of development.
FJ: Eric Harland has played a role in projects of that the four of you
have been involved with, but many people may not be hip to his groove.
(All members)
STEFON HARRIS: Oh, he's a very unique musician. He has his own sound and
his own approach to playing. He's a very sensitive musician, so he knows
how to color and he's very subtle. And of course, he has a solid groove,
which nice if you're a drummer now a days, somebody who can really lay
it down. He's a special musician, Fred. He has this one special gift that
no matter what is going on, if Eric Harland is on the stage, you're going
to feel good. It doesn't matter what kind of music you're playing, he
has such a warm, beautiful spirit, it just makes you feel good to be on
the bandstand with that cat.
JASON MORAN: Yeah, he's unbelievable (laughing). It's his touch. He has
like a touch thing that I really enjoy and a lot of different colors too.
When we were in high school, he was like really into the Elvin, Art Blakey
bag. So he was well rooted in what I call a big beat. It was like really
heavy and it was always well defined. I think when a drummer has that,
every musician should have that, just to be able to follow when a drummer
starts, or when the other rhythm section players start to not play on
the beat, you should always be able to clearly hear where the beat is.
He had that developed already so he just added on top of it, different
layers and different layers. And I think the best point in his career,
one of the better moments was when he got with Betty Carter, because to
play with a singer is a different type of bag in many situations. And
so when he got with Betty, he really started to master his colors and
he started to master his dynamics and he started to master his time also.
She would do things at blazing speeds and she would do things that would
slow to a crawl. After he came out of there, he was like all, what he
wanted to add to it. He's developed this type of thing where he talks
about a person's speech as in correlation with what he plays on the drums
and how he forms a solo and how he supports the rhythm section when they
play. So he's a well-studied musician and he has all types of influences
as far as music. He has a strong gospel background, which is what a lot
of drummers have who are coming out of this New Orleans second line thing.
Idris has what I call a big beat also, Idris Muhammad. I term him with
that type of drummer, who is well versed in many, many styles of music
and that's what he is. He's become like a master.
GREG
OSBY: He sounds like himself and he's readily identifiable. I can hear
him play and I would know who it is and that's remarkable for a young
drummer to do who doesn't have an incredibly extensive track record or
recording history. A lot of it has to do with, a lot of these young people,
they're coming up in the hip-hop generation and a lot of people thumb
their nose at hip-hop and other types of music, but these musics are mosaics
of a whole bunch of different types of music. Anybody that into that type
of music, they get a chance to listen to a whole bunch of different types
of music without being aware of what it is, and so they've developed this
broad mindedness that people of my generation didn't have. People in my
generation were either funk musicians or hardcore jazz musicians or blues
cats. There was very little this and that. It was either this or that.
You had to make your choice and that's it. That's the course that you
take. I'm cut from a different cloth and I was ostracized for it, even
so still. These cats are more like me in a sense and that' why they appeal
to me. I can make a reference to a hip-hop record. They won't even know
who the original artist was or what the original recording was but they
will be able to reflect on something that might have been a hit and me
being a fan of that, I can relate to them on even ground. Eric displays
a looseness with a real stylistic sophistication. He's very colorful and
very complementary. I have really good kinships with great drummers and
I really enjoy playing with them because it's like walking on a tightrope.
MARK SHIM: A lot of people aren't aware of who he is and that's a shame
too. He's a very diverse player and just don't think that a lot of people
realize it. I think it's weird because a lot of his contemporaries or
people that know him well really don't realize that he could play the
type of music they like to play very well. I think what's scares them
is that he does a lot of things that they are not even capable of playing.
He plays a lot of different styles that they are not even capable of playing.
They probably don't think he can do the basic stuff that they like to
do. He's very diverse when it comes to his playing and it's a shame that
he hasn't been recognized much for it up to this point, but I think that
will change in due time though. Everybody who has sat down and really
tried to check him out live or wherever has really realized how amazing
he is.
FJ: There are artists, Dave Liebman and Herbie Nichols are examples, whose
albums do not do justice to their place in the lineage of the music. Keeping
in mind that most albums were recorded one to two years before its release,
does the media and the industry place too much emphasis on an artist's
recordings? (All members)
STEFON HARRIS: Well, it's almost a different beat for me, making a recording
compared to playing live. When I record, I'm looking to make very clean
documents of the compositions as sort of a point of reference, so that
when people hear that record and then they come to hear us play, they're
going to hear what we're doing to that music. It's a little more structured
when I do a recording. Whereas live, it's very, very spontaneous and it's
different every single night. Of course, we have some spontaneity in there,
but I like, and this is just my personal opinion, I like to have a very
structured environment when I record. It's a tough balance. It's a tough
balance. But performing is, live performance is an art form in it of itself.
We're on stage and we're trying to communicate something to people. If
people are sitting there and they're smelling the atmosphere and watching
what's going on, we have to be a part of those senses also. It's not just
the ears. It's not just the sound. So performing, there's a certain presence
that you have to carry to articulate certain emotions and there's a certain
intensity that needs to build throughout your body so that people can
get involved with the music visually, not only sonically. Whereas, when
you listen to the CD, you don't have that element. It's just different.
Jazz is a live art form. You have to go see it live. There's some great
recordings, but the spontaneity and the sense of democracy is only captured
live, when you are there watching it.
JASON MORAN: It's hard to say because I don't know what the emphasis was
on the records in the '50s, '60s, or even before then, like what would
they think about John Coltrane's Giant Steps when it came out or Andrew
Hill's Smoke Stack when it came out. It's a totally different approach,
which I think is involved with making money now, than it was before. It
is very evident when you look at record covers. Record covers aren't as
artistic as they used to be. You can't see a cat sitting on the cover
with his horn in his hand. It's like real unartistic in many senses of
the word. I think that the record companies and the media are starting
to put a lot of emphasis on what they think a good record is and why they
think it is good. When you read reviews in the times like about classical
music concerts, you rarely read reviews about classical music that is
on CD because some of it is great and some of it is just standard repertoire
that has been re-recorded. Some of it is new music, like Pierre Boulez
did a string of concerts over the weekend and they talked more about the
concert that he just did and the speeches that he gave. I went to see
him on Friday and it was just interesting to see a cat of his stature
talking about his development. I think a lot of the artistic means have
been lost and I don't fault anyone but the musician most of all. I just
think that the state of our music, jazz music, it's starting to revive
itself, but I really think that it's in a shallow state right now. Things
change and some people don't even care about their album cover, but I
just think that in the entire picture of what you're trying to depict
about your music, than the cover is like a very important facet. Everybody
has their own agenda. My agenda is art for now and hopefully forever.
GREG OSBY: Absolutely. Absolutely. Especially with the grading system,
these three stars or five stars or three or four mikes or however they
judge records. It's kind of ridiculous and subjective and it's based upon
a writer's framework of reference at that moment. I'm sure a lot of writers
have dissed the record and then gone back later and after they have listened
to a lot of stuff, say, "Yeah, I was wrong." But a lot of people own up
to that or they won't own up to the fact that they just don't understand
what they're hearing. It's above their level of comprehension. All it
would take would be a phone call. You could grill a cat into the ground,
"OK, what were you doing? What were you trying to do? What was your resources?
How much research did you do?" They can get it straight from the horse's
mouth. Then if they really don't like a recording, then it just doesn't
appeal to them. I would agree a lot more with a bad review. "It doesn't
touch me or it doesn't move me." They could use a disclaimer, "This is
just my opinion. I don't mean to take money out of a cat's pocket or make
his child starve or prevent him from paying his rent. This just isn't
happening." Humility is key here. Everybody thinks they know everything.
They have all the answers. They use all the superlatives and same type
of words and descriptions that everyone else has used. That's another
big problem I have with jazz criticism and things is just like there is
just a ten-word list about the same type of descriptions (laughing). It's
like they had to do a multiple choice in critics' school or whatever and
if you fail you can't be a critic. You have to use the word acidic, acerbic,
left of center, off kilter, edgy, stuff like that (laughing). Young lion,
that's at the top of the list. You have to call somebody a young lion.
I'm like, "Man, don't these cats own thesauruses?" I would rather they
use like an eight syllable word that nobody has ever used than use those
words.
MARK SHIM: It's all within the ears of the beholder. I try not to because
I try to put everything into perspective. It depends on who is looking
at it. Some people think the contract is the big thing and what record
label that you're on is a big thing. Everybody on every record label is
all on different levels and just because I'm on the same record label
as whoever, like Joe Lovano or Greg Osby, doesn't mean that we're all
on the same level and that we're all at the same level of creativity because
everybody is in their own little circle as to where they are and the directions
that they are going. I don't really read into those things. Everybody,
at the same token, has the ability to change what they are doing whether
it's negative or positive or the direction that they're going in at the
drop of a dime. It's hard to do, but everybody is capable of doing that
if they really want to, if they realize that what they're doing may not
be saying something. I never really take that too seriously, maybe some
people do blow that out of proportion. I'm always liking to check out
people's records and see the progress that they have made over the years
from record to record, but also live, in live performances to see they
are doing after a couple of years to notice their progress.
FJ: You have been coined as a young lion and you are not young at all.
(Greg Osby only)
GREG OSBY: It is funny to me. I look at the Downbeat list and I see people
who haven't had a current release in years or even if they did, I sounds
like the same thing they put out in the fifties. There's nothing new or
adventurous, exciting or innovative. It's almost like you get points for
being a survivor, for having been a junkie or something, alcoholic, and,
"Well, he's still kicking." I got like two votes and this cat got like
two hundred and his record sounds real lame or it sounds like some smooth
jazz. I'm like, "What is this?" I guess well they figured the cats gonna
die or something. I don't know what the criteria is and I don't mean to
disrespect or diss anybody because people, in the final analysis, you
can only be judged by the work that you do and hopefully, everything I
do will stand on its own. If they don't get it today, maybe they'll grow
some intellectually and in a couple of years and listen to it and say,
"Awe, man, this is happening. I was wrong." I've done this as an artist.
I said, "Awe, this cat can't play. He's not offering anything. What he's
saying is not credible. It's not valid." And then after I grew a little
bit and I wasn't such a hothead youngster and I was patient enough to
turn off the phone, the pager, and sit down and actually listen to some,
I said, "Wait, this guy was killing." You have to be humble and that's
what it's all about.
FJ: The hype surrounding you guys is kind of this Blue Note for the new
millennium, if you believe your own press, it must be a tough cross to
bear? (All members)
STEFON HARRIS: I don't really think about it too much. I've tried not
to. That is a lot of pressure, but you know, Fred, I'm just trying to
write some music man. I'm just trying to play and I really love to be
on stage and to perform. It's such an incredible thing to have a piece
of music come through you. You write it down on a piece of paper and a
couple of months later, you're on the bandstand and you hear this magic
that just started as a tiny cell, three notes, and you hear it come to
life. Wow. I just love that so much. If I can communicate some of that
love to people and that means that we're helping jazz, than OK, that's
great.
JASON MORAN: That is, but I don't even think about it because there is
nothing to think about. You can't compare me to Herbie Hancock, or McCoy
Tyner, or Andrew Hill, those guys are masters of the instrument. I have
an affiliation with them and I rap with Andrew and there's much love and
respect for them. People are going to hype up whatever they want, when
they want. I can't change anything that they do. As far as I'm concerned,
like Andrew says, "You don't read your press, you weigh it." He means
that it is just a piece of paper with words on it, written by some writer,
so you can take it for what it's worth. I've gotten reviews from Italy
where a cat just ripped the record apart. I was like, "Well, great. That's
fine." Because I don't expect everyone to love the record. It's not for
everyone to love. If people want to say, "They are the next coming." That's
a little premature because we are all very young. I may decide to quit
when I'm twenty-seven, although I know I won't. You never really know
what will happen. I'm just going to keep going. I don't really think about
that at all.
GREG OSBY:
Not necessarily. It's great. I'm also standing in good company. It's like
some of the hippest cats that thought to do something new, they've done
it on that label. It's kind of awkward for me to be kind of cast with
a lot of cats that I'm almost old enough to be their father. It's cool
because they're mature and well spoken and representative of a class value
system and they have a lot to say and they are doing really good work
and they are putting a lot of effort and a lot of thought into it. I would
rather be lumped in the same class as, you know, Fred, they don't mention
me and Wynton in the same sentence or me and Branford in the same sentence
or people like that. I'm a year old than Wynton. But it's cool, because
like I said, these cats are doing good things.
MARK SHIM: For me, personally, I'm not thinking that way. If people want
to look at it that way then I think they are going about looking at it
the wrong way. To me it's not any kind of pressure. I know who was on
the label back in the '60s and they were great in their own right of course.
They did their thing, but the only thing you can do is worry about yourself
and not worry about who came before you and what they did before you.
I try to worry about what am I going to do to define myself and my playing.
Hopefully, my peers will do the same thing, to define themselves and not
try to copy other people and just try to be original. I'm not worried
about, "Will I make a record as good as Blue Train?" I never think like
that. I don't think that is the way to think.
FJ: Let's talk about the New Directions record. (Mark Shim only)
MARK SHIM: Honestly speaking on the album, we did it in two days, what
is it, two days in the studio and most all the tunes we did, we rehearsed
on the spot and just recorded them. Fortunately, everyone in that band
is very professional and very talented that we were able to pull it off.
Honestly speaking, Fred, if you want my honest opinion, I wish we did
some live recordings or they used some of the live recordings that we
did on the road. I think that was a much better representation of what
the New Directions band was all about. I guess people want to hear, or
certain people demanded for certain tunes to be on the record in a certain
style, I guess, to be thrown back so it will just try to carry on in the
tradition of Blue Note and try to recognize the stuff that came before
in our own way, but I thought we represented the stuff much better on
the road though. It didn't come out bad though. I still like what we did
because fortunately, as I said, we're very talented musicians or everybody
in that band was talented enough to make it work. I really was impressed
with the stuff we did on the road though.
FJ: What are some of the things that people do in the audience that rubs
you the wrong way when you are on the bandstand? (All members)
STEFON HARRIS: Wow, that's a tough question, Fred. I've never been asked
that question. Well, I don't like smoking (laughing). Hey, Fred, the scent
gets all in your clothes. I just came back from Germany and there was
like a lot of smoke in the clubs. Twice it happened, where my eyes, I
started to cry. Smoke got all in my eyes. It irritates me. That's like
a physical distraction to me, so if I'm trying to concentrate and I can't,
I literally had to stop because I couldn't open my eyes. I don't know
what other people would say. That's one of the things. I tend to play
off of the people's energy. I just think that you can come to people and
you will have them there. They will be there with you. And then some people
you lose and that sort of changes the energy of the room, which affects
the way you perform, so I don't know if I dislike it. I don't really put
a judgment on it. I can put a judgment on the smoking. I don't like that.
As far as attitudes about the music, it's real so I don't really judge
it. Just take it for what it is.
JASON MORAN: One is somebody sitting right behind me and I can hear their
conversation more than I can play. That's one, especially if it is about
a hockey match or something. I usually don't get frustrated unless like
the talking is really, really out of hand. That's what I get irked about
the most. I just really try to make do. I usually tune out what's going
on in the audience. We played in London over the summer with Greg and
there was this guy, he was talking loud. I couldn't hear him. He was a
little further back in the club and somebody said, "Could you calm down?"
Sure enough, the guy kept talking and so a guy picked up a bottle and
cracked him over the head with it. It started like a brawl. We had no
clue, until afterwards, I see this cat sitting outside with a bloody shirt
and blood coming out of his head and I was like, "Hold up. What happened?"
And he was like, "While you all were playing, somebody tried to calm someone
else down and so they started a fight." That's Ronnie Scott's, which is
notorious for being a very loud club. It's a place where a lot of people
go just to go, kind of like Blue Note in New York. But that's about it,
if they are just sitting right up on m and they're really loud. Because
I have played in places where people don't pay attention, I don't mind
that. I don't mind it at all. You come in here to waste your money or
you just come in here to talk with your friends, that's fine. If you come
here to hear me and you talk while I'm playing, that's a different issue.
I can't even name another one, but watch I remember it next time I get
on the bandstand like, "Oh, man, I should have told Fred this."
GREG OSBY: Smoke. Smoke right in the front row. I don't mind smoking,
but not people like blowing stogies, smoking cigars. I play a wind instrument
so that's the problem. During ballads and people are totally ignoring
it and they're talking right in the front row. I dig the ambience. I dig
chatter, but if it is in respect to the music, if somebody is explaining
to their wife what's going on. They are telling somebody the title or
something, but if they are talking about their stocks. Like in New York,
a lot of people come to the shows and they're into jazz. They're not into
music at all. They're having a business meeting. They're entertaining
their wife on their anniversary. That's kind of a drag. When the talk
isn't related to the music, that's kind of a drag. There's very little
that bugs me. Oh, another one, Fred, when people come up and have requests.
You're standing on the bandstand. You rehearsed the shit out of your band
and you have all this high concept music and you hope people get it and
you hope that if they don't get it that it will kick in later when they
get home, "Oh, that's what they were trying to do." But not when they
come up and they're like, "We're having a birthday. Can you play 'Happy
Birthday?'" Something real dumb that it makes me want to backhand somebody
and pimp slap them. I don't come to you when you are behind your word
processor or whatever. Don't come up here. I'm working here. But very
little bugs me because it's part of the game.
MARK SHIM: I guess the basic things that you can ask for is that people
show interest and be respectful and not talk or try to keep the talking
down to a minimum. In a perfect world, I would like everybody not to smoke,
but that's the way the world is, people smoke, especially in Europe. It's
hard to play when people smoke and smoke is blowing all over the place.
As far as I'm concerned, I just play the music and if people are going
to embrace it the music and like it then they are going to like it, if
not, you can't force them to like it.
FJ: What is the greatest misconception about jazz musicians? (All members)
STEFON HARRIS: That we're old. Yeah, that's the biggest misconception,
and that we're dead (laughing). We're either really old or we're dead.
There is not this sense that the music is alive and that it moves, it's
growing, continuing. You don't get that sense of that cycle. I don't get
the feeling that the average agile thinks of jazz in that sense. And then
the misconception about the music is that they think you have to know
a lot of stuff, which is very untrue. That's purely the ego of musicians,
critics, and the jazz elite. It makes us feel good if we know something
that other people don't know, but what do we really know? It's emotion,
Fred. We all know love. We all know fear and compassion and reverence.
We all know those emotions. We are not empowered by this music. So you
can play a couple of notes in a certain order. That doesn't empower you
as a human being. It's coming through you. That's a misconception that
a lot of people have, that you have to have this great knowledge of jazz
to get it. Sometimes someone who has never heard that before, they go
hear something and they don't like it. It might be because they don't
like it. You're not going to like everything that you hear. All it requires
is a little patience.
JASON MORAN: That they're cool (laughing). Most of them really aren't.
Most of them are some really corny individuals. They mostly seem pretty
corny to me. I deem myself a relative outsider because when I was growing
up, me and my brother, we just used to sit around and look at people who
thought they were cool. There's a difference between people who think
they are cool and people who are just cool because they have like a different
type of walk. They wear like maybe some different type of clothing, like
Henry Threadgill. I can look at him and I'll be like, "Man, he's like
really cool." I don't even know him. His music is real happening, but
every time I hear him speak or have seen like interviews with him, he's
just like really deep. I'm just like, "Man." He's a really cool individual.
He lives in India for half a year. That's like an alternative way of doing
things. Then I see a lot of musicians and I'm just like, "Naw, you a bit
corny." It just seems like they know a lot, but it's just the presentation,
I just think that most of them are corny. They are a lot of cool one,
but there are just as many corny ones. I think that's the biggest misconception
that everybody's real cool or they're laid back, when everybody is uptight
about their music and egotistical, just as egotistical as some of those
cats sitting in an investment banker's office worried about his sell.
GREG OSBY: That they are pompous and intolerant of other types of music.
Now there are some people that are steadfast in their distain for any
other types of music, but they're just people and they happen to be jazz
musicians. I know a lot of classical musicians that don't like anything
other than what they're into. They are like a horse with blinders on.
They don't see anything but what they want to see. They don't see the
world revolving around them and they're not influenced by it. Whether
they are like fifteen or fifty years old, they're playing the same thing
with no development and no progress. So it's not exclusive to jazz musicians.
I know a lot of jazz cats that are actually living a lie. They really
like hip-hop and they like a whole bunch of secular music or popular music
but they don't say so because it's not politically correct and they don't
want to get dissed by their peers and stuff. They think it chips away
at their validity if it's made public that they have synthesizers and
sequencers and stuff at home or they have turntables. They like a whole
lot of hip-hop and stuff and I know a whole bunch of them that do but
say they don't (laughing).
MARK SHIM: When people say mainstream jazz, all of America thinks it's
boring music, but that is not necessarily the case with a lot of us that
are playing music or our own creative, improvised music. Many younger
generation people may think that certain jazz may not be up to date with
all the other types of music that are going on like hip-hop or R&B or
even heavy metal. That's a misconception.
FJ: Any New Year's resolutions? (All members)
STEFON HARRIS: Patience, I want to be patient with myself, patience and
humility. You have this intensity like, "Man, I really want to work hard.
I really want to be great." But sometimes that forces you to go into a
certain direction.
JASON MORAN: Oh, man, Fred (long pause). It's to do more work. It's to
do more work. Recently, I've been reading, I've gotten back into this
Eastern philosophy books like Miyamoto Musashi (famous Japanese samurai)
and watching a lot of these samurai films by Akira Kurosawa. Watching
the, they call it the bushido. It's the way of the samurai. It's just
how focused they are. They talk about not surrounding yourself with others
that are not making any contribution to your life. Limiting who you are
associated with and it says that you must study diligently and I don't.
I'm trying to pump myself up to really taking advantage of the time that
I have on my hands and to try and do something with it. Trying to really
develop and really study different compositional techniques. That's my
resolution, but I'm starting like today. I'm not waiting until the first
of next year. In the past couple of weeks, that's what I'm trying to concentrate
on.
GREG OSBY: Oh, yeah. I'm kind of embarking on a self-imposed study period,
a sabbatical of you will. Just to kind of tighten up a lot of loose ends
and kind of rethink a lot of conceptual properties. Finishing up things
that are as yet unformulated that I've given a little thought to but haven't
like really saw them through. Doing a lot of writing and basically a whole
lot of musical self-improvement. I really want to re-establish my place
in this whole music. I will be forty next year. I don't want it to just
come and go without a bang. I'm going to have to do some landmark work
so that I will be satisfied. I have a high criteria that I have to follow,
that I have to meet for myself.
MARK SHIM: To get a whole bunch of chops. That's about it (laughing).
FJ: What are some of the essential recordings you have in your collection?
(All members)
STEFON HARRIS: Miles Davis, Filles De Kilimanjaro (Columbia), Shirley
Horn with strings, Here's To Life (Verve), Stevie Wonder, Songs in the
Key of Life (Motown), Beethoven Symphony No. 7.
JASON MORAN: Andrew Hill, Smoke Stack (Blue Note), the two basses are
just phenomenal. What's the Trane, Dear Old Stockholm (Impulse) with Roy
Haynes. Little old Roy Haynes was playing behind Trane and it was like
amazing drumming, I think. Bjork, Homogenic (Elektra), that record is
a classic as far as I'm concerned from start to finish. There is not a
flaw in it at all. What else do I steadily play? It's hard because I don't
really steadily play anything. On the hip-hop genre, I just pick up what
is new and spin it and spin it and spin it for like maybe a couple of
months until something new comes out. Right now, I just got some West
Coast stuff, Sa-Fire, Pharoahe Monch, Raekwon, those guys, that's what
I'm really listening to. That Bjork is really like a staple though. That
has been around for a couple of years and I always rock that. What else?
Marvin Gaye, What's Going On (Motown). That's probably about it.
GREG OSBY: Anything by Bjork. She's like my favorite pop artist, hands
down. I actually dig Madonna too, to be honest. I dig Sting, D'Angelo.
I'm reinvestigating a whole lot of Charlie Parker recordings and dissecting
them and taking them apart. I am just really taking them and breaking
them down. I'm listening to a whole bunch of Duke Ellington.
MARK SHIM: Lately none. I kind of just hear what's out there. I honestly
haven't just went to the collection and picked out one and said, "Let
me listen to this." I haven't done anything like that for a long while.
It's been a while since I've done something like that.
FJ:
I was at the newsstand the other day and saw that one of the magazines
had a poll for who was the artist of the century, is that an unfair question
to ask? (All members)
STEFON
HARRIS: Well, I guess it's kind of unfair. Yeah, that's a tough thing
to say, Fred. All those types of lists and categories are unfair. They
are just estimate testaments. If I had to pick somebody, I might have
to think about Louis Armstrong. Just thinking about the fact that he didn't
have all of this information before him. His idea to just go ahead and
check it out and explore. John Coltrane is right up there also for me
because of the level of articulation that he achieved. When you hear his
music through the years, it's a chronicle of the experiences he was having
in life. You don't have to read these books. You get a sense of who he
was as a man from just listening to his sound. That's the ultimate goal
for myself as a musician. I really, really admire what he was able to
achieve.
JASON MORAN: No, I didn't answer that. To even put one down is to put
one over the another and they've all made such significant contributions
that I can't even put one over another, so I didn't contribute to that
poll. I saw that though.
GREG OSBY: I would have to say, Charlie Parker. That's an easy one but
I would have to say Charlie Parker because the cat, like so many great
musicians before him, he totally redefined the way music was conceived,
performed, and composed. I'm sure he didn't do it single handily. He had
some influences that we probably don't know about that are totally unsung.
Just his delivery and his portrayal of music, it was just a major milestone
in the evolution of contemporary expression.
MARK SHIM: I honestly don't think you can answer that with just one person.
I think there are stages of the century and there are people that are
very important to it. Off the bat, I can automatically think of like two
or three people in improvised music that are very important. I can't pick
one above the other. Of course, you can start off with like Louis Armstrong
and take that all the way up to someone like Miles Davis and you can put
Duke Ellington right in the middle of all that. Of course, Louis Armstrong
is very important because he started it all, but who knows if we would
be sitting here without Miles Davis? I can't think you can put it all
on one person.
FJ: Is jazz capturing a young audience? How crucial is achieving that
task? And what are you doing individually to bring a younger audience
to the music? (All members)
STEFON HARRIS: I'm not sure right now. I think that the alternative is,
you see, Fred, the problem that I think we have is that the term "jazz"
is used very loosely right now. You have some groups who are capturing
young audiences. They are really like rock groups that have jazz influence.
I don't know if I would call it jazz per say. So then you get people expecting
the jazz musician to capture the audience of the groups that are playing
basically rock or dance music for the teenagers. I don't know? That's
a really tough question. I think it's possible for us to capture a younger
audience. I don't know if we are doing that right now. Part of that has
to do with the fact that I don't think we have any control or we're not
controlling the image of jazz. We're letting people think of jazz what
they will. Whoever thought of the term contemporary jazz for that style
of music, that's pure genius, because the way I see it is, you have like
this whole hip-hop generation, I grew up in the rap generation also, but
you reach a certain age where you kind of outgrow a lot of that music.
You're not going to be fifty years old playing Lil' Kim for your grandkids.
That's probably not going to happen. Once you reach a certain maturity,
you start to search for other styles of music. And then socially, jazz
has this hip thing about it. So now, based on the term jazz on that music,
people can listen to that music, which is, I call instrumental pop music
because to my ear that's what it sounds like. They can listen to that
and call it jazz and they get the whole feeling that I'm intelligent or
I'm hip because I'm listening to jazz. I think that was pure genius. Part
of what we're going to have to do is control our own image, what is jazz.
Not even to define it narrowly, but just, if we're going to have a younger
audience, just visually, we have to be a little hipper. Like the young
cats, we all wear suits. It's not necessarily what the average cat our
age would be doing. My take on it is, what I would like to do is I would
like to present options to people. I think that they will come to the
music when they're ready. Like to go out and present the music, like I
was saying about the people who are in college. You go to colleges now,
that's when kids are reading literature that they've never even heard
of. They are reading Middle Eastern philosophies that mom would never
approve of. They're minds are wide open, so why don't we go there and
just introduce them to the music so they know it's an option. Because
to compete with Puff Daddy, you're going to have trouble. They are dealing
with sex. There hormones are going and if you are a guy, you want to have
sex. To go dancing and to get the woman sweating and you get the beat
going, you have a drink, you talk a little, they create an entire atmosphere,
which is conducive to what someone in their age category is thinking about.
Now, jazz can be thought of in that way if we put the image like, "OK,
you want to take your lady out to a jazz club, she's going to think you
are really hip." It's a marketing thing. I would like to go there and
just introduce them to the music. In hopes that one day they are going
to grow out of "You Remind Me of My Jeep." They are not going to say that
to their wife. You can say that to a kid, but at a certain point, you're
not going to want to say that to your wife. She's probably not going to
appreciate that. You're going to be looking for "My One and Only Love,"
lyrics like "Lush Life," Billy Strayhorn. It's going to go to a whole
other level. I can't compete with Puff Daddy. More power to him.
JASON MORAN: Yeah, I think it is capturing a young audience, slowly but
surely. Two was how important. It's very important because who is going
to buy music thirty years from now, or who is going to come to our concerts
thirty years from now, after the old folks have come and gone. It is very
evident because I played for four days at the Knitting Factory last week
with the trio and a lot of young people were there. They were just as
interested in it as anybody else. That was also very evident on the New
Directions tour that we did. It was a very well mixed crowd. And the third
part was what am I doing. Mine is to invite every young friend that I
know to my shows, just to see live music on a higher level than a Toni
Braxton concert or a Wyclef Jean concert, which I am personally not a
fan of because the music is banal and it's not as in depth as R&B music
was twenty years ago. Even in the seventies, it was a lot hipper. They
still had live bands and they were making their own grooves. Now it's
starting to revive itself, so I think people are starting to have more
of an affiliation or they are trying get acclimated with live music again.
I try to invite as many young people as I can to the clubs. Usually when
they come, they're like, "Man, that was great." Especially last week,
I was playing Rhodes instead of piano and some people got to see, not
really a different side of my music, but Rhodes made like its rebirth
in a lot of R&B music, a lot of rap music, so people can hear the Rhodes
and be like, "Oh, I know that sound." That's the sound of a sample that
they heard on a Tupac song. Usually when they come, they are just blown
away. That's what I'm trying to do is to get all my friends who are halfway
interested in something, rather than going to a dance club every night
and sitting at a bar, trying to pick up on some woman or trying to be
picked up by some man, but come to this club and check out some live music,
which I don't want to say is better, but it's another alternative.
GREG
OSBY: I will answer that in reverse. What I'm doing is I'm hiring young
people and so in turn, people look at my bandstand and they see young
people. That's appealing to a lot of young people. They walk by. They
come into a club and they don't know that kind of music it is really.
They see young people that are their age on the bandstand and they say,
"Wow, they must be hip to be into this, because they are my age. They
look like me." That's been a repellent in jazz for a long time. They look
on the bandstand and see these fat, potbelly, unattractive, out of shape
cats that just don't reflect anything but the notions and tendencies of
a person's grandfather. The music sounds old too. It's almost like a you
are what you eat thing. I know a lot of young jazz musicians that are
younger than myself that actually look thirty years older than I do because
of the way they think. It's kind of a debilitating thought process. I
stay youthful by being into contemporary trends and everything that's
happening now and I listen to my band members. I don't go out seeking
young cats, but I dig that image because a lot of people in my peers are
just set in their way and they won't change. They're not interested in
any new concepts or new directives or any kind of thing like that and
I can't break that and I'm not trying to corral somebody into doing something
they don't want to do. These younger cats are not jaded or callus or anything.
Plus, they are really willing to do new things. They want to be there.
It's very important to capture a young audience because the music has
to move on. It has to move on. I don't want the music to die with a generation.
I would like to capture an audience and have those audiences grow with
me. "Yeah, I saw him back in '88 and then I saw him again in '98." I want
it to continue and they turn me on to their kids and the kids hear the
music in the house. That's how people get hip to the music. That's why
I got hip to music. I would hear music in the house that my mother played.
I'm still into that music. It reminds me of something. If parents played
for their music right now, this disposable pop music that is being produced,
than those kids won't have fond memories of their youth. It will be like
an erasure of their period. I can remember where I was and what the social
climate was when I hear certain songs from the '60s and '70s and it's
like, "Yeah, I was there." It's like who shot JFK or where were you. I
can't predict but I don't think they will be humming Jay-Z tunes. I doubt
it. I think it is capturing a young audience and I think it can. It's
just proper marketing or proper placement or whatever. Earlier this year,
we toured with a group called the Blue Note New Directions. It was a group
of Blue Note signers that I put together that I thought would represent
the label. We did a tour that was sponsored by Camel cigarettes and Esquire
Magazine. The group was myself, Jason Moran, Stefon Harris, Mark Shim
on tenor saxophone, Nasheet Waits, and Tarus Mateen. We toured all over
the United States and we played in these alternative venues that weren't
jazz clubs. We played in like retirement homes. We played in a cigar bar.
We played in like a strip joint. We played in a line dancing place in
Texas. We played in all these wild, we played in restaurants where they
actually had to erect a bandstand. It was great and it was overwhelmingly
and unanimously received. A lot of people that frequent these places,
they didn't even like jazz. They didn't know anything about jazz. They
didn't even know that we were going to be there. We got a lot of walk
by traffic people that were just curious seekers. They stopped by and
saw these young cats on the bandstand and they stayed. That's the only
way they would have been introduced to that music by it being displayed
at their frequent haunt. We sold a lot of product. We sold a lot of CDs
at these places, much more than any of those local record chains and CD
establishments would have because we were selling them at the door. People
saw the group and they were able to buy it right there. We were selling
them by the box load. It was just a great marketing tool. It just showed
me that a lot of these corporations have what they probably look at and
regard as disposable income. They can sponsor these groups and but them
on the road. They paid for our accommodations. They paid for our travel.
They paid salaries and it was like a write off for them, but it was beneficial
because people got turned onto their product for whatever it was, smoking,
drinking, or whatever. But it was wonderful for them to be tied in a business
sense to this youth market and a wholesome entity like Blue Note and young
jazz musicians. It was refreshing in that respect. It can be done. I think
every jazz label would do well to establish a leg or a division in their
company of people that actually seek out corporate sponsorship or actually
seek out trying to route their young signees or any signees on that label
to alternative venues. I mean, we played in like heavy metal bar. We played
in like some grunge clubs where they actually do stage diving and people
would have spiked hair and holes in their jeans and the whole nine yards.
But they were bobbing to the jazz. I was floored. This cat's a surfer
dude (in his best surfer dude imitation), "Yeah, man. Man, this is fucking
jazz. Hey, man, you got anymore CDs?" They would buy CDs and they would
come by the hotel the next day with an armload of your CDs and you are
signing CDs for these surfer dudes, skateboard rats, the whole thing.
I was like, "Man, this is out." There's a whole lot of potential patrons
and lovers of the music out there. You just have to tap into it.
MARK SHIM: I think it is capturing some of them. It's hard though. The
way this country is set up, it's not easy to capture all the young people.
There's so many other things for them to be aware of before they're aware
of jazz. You can't fault people for that. It's just the way this country
is. I think it gets to some people and some people out there are aware
of it and captivated by it, but not that many. It's definitely important
though, for us to try and reach as many people as we can. That is the
future when all these great giants who started this whole music are gone.
All that's left is us. The older audience too, once they are gone, all
that's left is us and if we don't do anything, at least garner some kind
of attention with our generation, then the music is just not going to
survive. We're not going to have an audience for it. I always think that
there is enough for everybody. You can like all sorts music. You don't
have to hate other music to have your music be enjoyed. You don't have
to downplay hip-hop or metal or country. I think that there is enough
for everybody, but at the same time, we definitely have to do something
to at least get people interested in the jazz music that is being played
by the younger musicians in the market today. As far as what I'm doing,
it's kind of tough for me, Fred, because I haven't been out there that
much as maybe some of my other contemporaries have. I haven't been fortunate
enough to have my own full-length tour at this stage in my career. Hopefully,
I will. I just have one record put out under my name and I've been a sideman
in several bands and on several records. It's not like I have been single-handily
been able to do something on my own to get the attention of younger people
and get them interested in jazz.
FJ: What were some of the most influential bands in the history of the
music? (Stefon Harris only)
STEFON HARRIS: Miles Davis with Herbie Hancock, Wayne Shorter, and Tony
Williams, the group before that with Bill Evans, I mean, Miles Davis had
group after group in terms of being a leader. Yeah, I'd say all of Miles's
groups were very influential. Yeah, because they influenced, this generation,
we're big on that era, like there are a lot of pianists who sound like
Herbie Hancock, a whole lot. The whole dynamic thing with the drums, drummers
are just, it's like, you don't hear too many cats laying it down like
Philly Joe. Tony's influence is a little heavier on the cats of my generation
for whatever reason. I'm not saying it's good or bad, it just seems like
his influence is a little stronger. The guys from that era, Coltrane's
band, you've got a lot of McCoy, piano players who sound like McCoy and
of course drummers, just dynamically alone, you've got them trying to
deal with what Elvin was dealing with. My take on it is that hey, that
was that era. They were expressing a certain energy of their time and
I don't really know if that's what's going on right now.
FJ: I know you are big on films, what was the last good movie you saw?
(Jason Moran only)
JASON MORAN: The last movie that I actually watched, I saw last night.
It's called Happiness. Oh, Fred, that is a bugged out movie. Oh, man,
I had to tape it because it's that far out. I like Todd Solondz's movies,
Welcome To the Dollhouse. What was the last really great movie? It's got
to be Seven Samurai, which is the one that made the most profound affect
on me. I haven't seen too many new movies out because in New York they
are just too damn expensive. It's like nine or ten dollars. I want to
see Bringing Out the Dead, Scorsese's new film just because his artistry
is unmatched. Being John Malkovich, I want to see that. The Matrix was
really, I really thought was a really conceptual movie, just as far as
what the mind achieve, so I really dug that.
FJ: I know you like Takeshi Kitano films, have you had a chance to see
VIOLENT COP, I got the screener for it a couple of weeks ago.
(Jason Moran only)
JASON MORAN: That's that Takeshi movie. No, I haven't seen that yet, but
I've been reading about it. I've got to pick that up.
FJ: You remarked about how you and Wynton Marsalis are practically the
same age and yet I never see your name mentioned as his contemporary.
(Greg Osby only)
GREG OSBY: I agree. A lot of people don't see it that way, even though
we kind of deal from opposite sides of the fence. We agree on virtually
nothing. I think the value system is in tack and I think that there is
a mutual respect and also a desire for excellence and progress. So in
that respect we have a lot of similarities.
FJ: Because jazz accounts for so little of this country's entertainment
dollar, the economics of the industry results in an artist like Greg Osby
doesn't get more viable national recognition, simply from lack of exposure.
(Greg Osby only)
GREG OSBY: It's not like the money isn't there, but because of the eclecticism
of my art, it just doesn't lend itself to the ears of people that are
in the position to push the buttons at my record label and at other record
labels. A lot of these people are exaggerated fans with a suit. So they
have the power to sign people and drop people that they consider necessary.
At my label a lot of the attention attuned to people who don't need that
exposure anymore. She's my good friend and I love her dearly, Cassandra
Wilson, she's over. Everyone loves her and everybody is aware of her,
but she gets a full-page ad. She gets the endorsements, the spread, the
modeling contract, the movie roles and things like that. That's not to
sweat her because she deserves everything. She can sing pages from the
Bible and still sound good. She can sing anything, stop signs. This isn't
even selfishly speaking, I'd like to see some of that attention and some
of that financial consideration go to some of the young cats who could
use it to great advantage. They are not on the road with established elders
like Art Blakey and Max Roach and Elvin Jones and Betty Carter because
these groups don't exist anymore. People are coming to me, trying to be
in my band because they are looking at me of being in that gray area of
young cats and old cats. People send me CDs, emails, I'm flooded with
cats. "I want to audition. I want to be in your band. I think I fit."
And I don't even work that much. It's a sad state of affairs. People want
to work with me and I don't even work that much.
Fred
Jung is Jazz Weekly's Editor-In-Chief and knows who killed Baretta's wife.
Email him.
|
|